I guess I'll have to be the cog in the wheel here.
While I agree with Rosso, I've also had first-hand experience with a liquor store. While the product is different, the business model is the same. When we purchased our liquor store in Manteca, Ca., we had to bill it as "something special" over and beyond other liquor stores, especially big market vendors. We ended up spending over 100k to update our stock of "top shelf" liquors such as covassier and other velvet lined boxes in excess of $100. This made our name as the "biggest decanter selection in NorCal." In 7 years working weekends there, I only sold one bottle. Black Velvet, Jim Beam, Jose Cuervo, all flew off the shelves along with our "budget" brands. The top shelf continued to get dusted. The same concept goes for tobacco.
So yes, this does annoy me but I'm not the least bit surprised. There's a certain amount of certainty that there's not much we can do against "Big Money."
IMO, the patent issue and the seeds are two separate beasts. The patents will give "ownership" to the big investors. The seeds, once the monopoly is in place, will carry a heavier sentence to protect the patent holders. Can you imagine the enhanced sentencing guidelines for possessing seeds because they'll be considered as "manufacturing?"
I only grow for myself anymore so that's the direction I go when looking for genetics.